Early on, my favorite tracking compressor was the LA-3A. You could use them on anything. I still use hardware compression when recording most individual tracks, even in the box, kind of a holdover from my tape machine days. I usually run the kick and the snare through the compressors in the Porticos, but not a lot unless there is an effect I’m going for. My current vocal favorite is an M 149 into the Avalon with a little compression, then through an 1176 with a little more and then to the converters for recording. Our engineer Jake Saghi came up with this chain for a Matt New single in part through a shoot-out process, and I really like it.

Compressors can also help groups of instruments or vocalists hang together, so I often use them on those busses when mixing. It’s one reason I use busses rather than VCAs in Pro Tools. Another trick that digital has made easier, and less expensive, is chaining compressors in series so you don't ask for too much out of each one. This is cheaper and easier in mixing than going out to the hardware that we use for recording.

Compression on the mix bus is a whole different matter, and I’m experimenting with new ways to do that. In the past, I almost always had 1176LNs in there, with just a few db of reduction, 4:1 ratio, attack and release adjusted by ear. Rather than mix bus plugins, I now use almost exclusively the Rupert Neve Master Buss Processor. It's a hardware device that's an extraordinarily flexible mastering instrument. Transformers, red and blue silk, texture, width, depth, compressor and limiter. Ya gotta love it. Then a little touch of Ryan Schwabe's Gold Clip.

As everybody knows, many engineers have been disturbed by the trend to squeeze the life out of pop music in mastering, and even in mixing, to make it sound loud. Today there are brick wall limiter plugins with built-in loudness metering. You can stomp that tune right on down, make it loud and irritating. We do usually have a lookahead brick wall at something like -0.2 dbfs after the MBP and Gold Clipjust as a final insurance clip catcher. I'll sometimes crank that up on client mixes so they can get an idea of the finished product. We have a calibrated hardware spectrum analyzer and loudness meter on the control room monitor feed. At the end of the day though, for mastering, the best move is to hire a pro and send them a mix with dynamic range to work with. I try to send the mastering engineers tracks in the 10-15 LUFS range to work with.

Up until around 1970, jingles really were, uh, "jingles." Cute little ditties that were intentional earworms. Ask your grandmother to complete these lines: “You’ll wonder where the yellow went, when . . .” Or, “Mr. Clean gets rid of . . .” Then a change occurred. The goal became to make commercial music appealing in the same way popular music was. Barry Manilow is still remembered for the “You deserve a break today” stuff he did for McDonald’s. It was fun for us to do new arrangements of that for some seasonal and special promotions for them. He also did iconic music for Dr. Pepper, Band-Aid, Nationwide ("is on your side") and a lot of others. And anybody who saw the finale of Mad Men was reminded of “Buy The World A Coke” that some guys at McCann-Erickson did in 1971.

So, TRCPG did a lot of these pop music style jingles in the 70s. I wrote, arranged, produced, engineered, sang, played keyboards, and/or played trumpet on I’ll bet a hundred or more, for regional and a few national advertisers. These were the forerunners of what we now call "native ads". There were some good things about this. First, it helped pay the bills in the studio, when most of the pop and rock work was local groups doing demos as cheaply as they could. It helped a stable of singers and studio players make ends meet and gain increasing familiarity with the studio environment. And, as we tried to make these jingles sound as good as possible, we learned a lot about everything from mic placement to stereo/mono compatibility.

Later, as advertisers realized that they could license actual pop songs for their commercials, original jingle work fell off, and TRCPG turned to film sound and music for trade shows, stuff that's now called production music. I thought the work we did for McDonald's, Eli Lilly and Hampton Inn was particularly good. You can listen to some of this stuff on the Streams page of the web site.

In Studio Five, we don't have a big live room for tracking bands, just a nice big booth. One of the 4A had a reputation as a drum room, and several of the producers were using 20 or more mics on a drum kit. More than one on each drum, plus stereo overheads and three room mics (carefully measured with a cloth tape. I expected phase issues, but the kits sound fantastic, and of course you can phase align the tracks after recording either with a plugin or just sliding them. I've mixed some stuff where the drums were mic'd this way, and you're somewhat restricted because you have a lot of tracks with several drums on them. Levels and eq on the cymbals, for example, affect other drums to a considerable degree. My preference has always been one close mic per drum, except for kick and snare (both of which need two), and one pretty close mic (a KM-184 or 185, for example) for each cymbal. Maybe because only one of my earlier tracking rooms was as good as 4a, I didn't get in the habit of using room mics much. I like to have more control over each drum and cymbal in the mix with close mic'ing, and more control over ambiance with reverbs and echoes than with a bunch of room mics.

How has recording changed since you started out?

A lot in many ways, and not at all in others. The factors that should stay the same are great musicians in the right acoustical environment and ambiance, a wide range of high-end mics expertly placed, and an experienced engineer and producer. Lots of folks have de-emphasized these things in the switch to digital, thinking they can fix all this “in the box” after the players are gone. Sometimes you can, in today's DAWs. But sometimes you can't. In the pure analog days, it was a joke to say "We'll fix it in the mix." Tape made you get the performance right before thinking much about effects and editing.

Between 1972 and 1990, I did hundreds of songs and, uh, jingles on tape, using some great boards and outboard gear. My favorite board was the Harrison 3232C, with the Trident 80B right behind. We did a lot of our earliest work on one of Welton Jetton's first Auditronics 501 boards (mostly after modifying the eq on the channel strips), and later on an MCI JH-532. Mellencamp's single "Crumblin' Down" was recorded on the MCI. We had fader automation on it, the Harrison and the Trident. Took up tracks on the tape machine, and sometimes worked. That MCI board was so dense with electronics that you could feel the heat radiating up off the console. We upgraded the HVAC in Studio B twice.

Anymore, we tend to take DAWs for granted. I was remixing a McDonald's jingle the other day for fun. It had been recorded on 24-track tape with Dolby SR, so some time was spent baking, transferring, and decoding. Once we had it in Pro Tools, though, I was again amazed at what a different experience it was from back when we mixed it from tape. The male and female lead vocals were very good, but not perfect. So, into Melodyne they go. Now they're perfectly in tune. The male singer came in late on one entrance. Cut, paste (could have done it in Melodyne, too), boom - he's right on cue. And the flexibility with comping and mixing enabled a much better in the box. Instead of stuff coming by you in real time, 24-tracks at once, I could fix tracks one by one while looking at the waveforms as well as listening. A different, and probably better, experience.

On the other hand, rather than bouncing, I did real-time mixes to a "2trk" track in Pro Tools. So, when everything was ready to go, I could still have the experience of moving the faders myself when they needed to be moved. Fun to do, and no time-waster on a 60-second spot.

In fact, printing the mix in real time, especially as the final mix approaches, is my standard procedure now..

Are things being mic'd differently today?

One of the bigger differences I see is with drums. The tracking room in 4A had a reputation as a drum room, and we get some of that work. Several of the producers were using 20 or more mics on a drum kit. More than one on each drum, plus stereo overheads and three room mics, all precisely measure against each other. I expected phase issues, but the kits sounded fantastic, and of course you can phase align the tracks after recording either with a plugin or just sliding them. I've mixed some stuff where the drums were mic'd this way, and you're somewhat restricted because you have a lot of tracks with several drums on them. Levels and eq on the cymbals, for example, affect other drums to a considerable degree. My preference has always been one close mic per drum, except for kick and snare (either or both of which generally need two), and one pretty close mic (a KM-184 or 185, for example) for each cymbal. Maybe because only one of my earlier tracking rooms was as good as 4a, I didn't get in the habit of using room mics much, although they're standard for drums in Nashville. I like to have more control over each drum and cymbal in the mix with close mic'ing, and more control over ambiance with reverbs and echoes than with a bunch of room mics.

My philosophy may not be a lot of help to young folks out there because I started in the 70s on large frame analog consoles and tape machines. Even though we have Pro Tools and an S6 at TRC, my style retains elements from history. For example, we have quite a few analog preamps and compressors here, and I do use compressors when tracking. In theory, you don't need to do that going to digital with 32 bit floating point depth, but it gives me tracks that feel right to mix. I also use a Rupert Neve Master Bus Processor on my mix bus, rather than a plugin. Well, I do use a brickwall plugin at the very end, not to squash as in mastering but just to make sure I don't send out anything that's clipped.

Our first engineer, now producer Jake Saghi, and his young fellow Belmont grads don't have the loyalty to analog that was prevalent even ten years ago. And for pop and hip-hop you really can do it all in the box. They also use a lot of synthesizers and samples. I'm not a total antique, and do use samples for overdubbing keys, horns, strings and even bass sometimes, as well as drum replacement. But for country and classic rock nothing works for me like live musicians with the right acoustics, mics and analog preamps and compressors. And I can't get guitars to sound much like guitars inside Kontakt.

I do mostly remixing anymore, so I don't have control over what the tracks are like. I hope not too many potential clients read this, but if I have a specialty it is making average or even bad tracks into a good mix. Melodyne on vocals, Auto-tune on horn tracks, drum replacement, things like that. We have probably too many plugins here, and three-quarters of them are out of the plugins folder. But when you're working with tracks that weren't done by Garth in his studio it's good to have a huge palette of options for processing. I'm a physician, so maybe folks can think of me as a remix doctor instead of the transplant surgeon I once was. And I can make great tracks into a super mix, but average tracks are probably my specialty. I live to make them shine in the mix.

I’m a hybrid, but falling farther and farther into the box. Almost everything I record goes through an analog preamp, usually one with tubes. I love our tube LaChappells, and we’ve got Rupert Neve, Avalon, UAD and Trident 80B channel strips. Back in 4A, where we had a big live room, we had almost 60 high-end mics, and about the same number of preamps and channel strips. One of my favorite vocal chains is a CV4 or M149 into the Avalon and then an 1176. We can record to the Studer 24-track, but don't very often anymore.

The S6 is a superb tool for comping and mixing, we have hundreds of plugins, and of course we can route stuff out of the box to the analog outboard gear. And the plugins keep getting better. I liked our Harrison board and was going to get a couple of the new hardware Harrison 3232 channel strips, but Harrison had manufacturing delays and the UAD plugin is so good I just go with it when I want that sound.

Today you can get "that analog sound", if you want it, right along with the capabilities of Pro Tools on the S6. But don't try to take away my Rupert Neve MBP!